It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try one of the links below or a search?
Popular Articles:
-
Oh Cannabis!
-
Cocktail lovers – watch out! Are alcoholic drinks similar to non-alcoholic ones (and if only for trademark purposes)?
-
Geographical Indications: India’s PGI application for ‘Basmati’
-
No monopoly on blue and silver for Red Bull
-
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. Time to rethink the EUTM “unitary character”.
-
Trademark case: ACT 898 Products Inc. v. WS Industries Inc., USA
Recent Articles:
-
Registration of the protected designation of origin “HALLOUMI” in the EU – The General Court comes to the rescue of the European Commission and of the Republic of Cyprus
-
‘Don’t fence me in’: what if your locally used trade name is in between one proprietor’s earlier trade name and a corresponding younger trade mark? – the finale of the Classic Coach Company case
-
Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’
-
Healthy things and Paris Bar – two new GC decisions on “weak marks”
-
Anti- Counterfeiting, Czech Republic, EU trade mark law, Exhaustion of rights, Grey online sales, Parallel imports, Trademark
Information claim the Czech way: smell of partial victory for Chanel against online retailer
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the UK Court of Appeal diverges from the CJEU in statutory acquiescence
Random Articles:
-
Can you smell the “Cndy Brz”?
-
General Court comes to a decision about The Standard of genuine use
-
The Spanish woman – always the game changer!
-
Sweden: James Bond, tobacco and the reputation of 007
-
Can a TM symbol mislead the public if no trademark has been registered?
-
Top 3 Posts of the Autumn from our IP Law Blogs
-
USA: Pronman v. Styles, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, No. 15-12651, 9 March 2016
-
Trademark case: The Ohio State University v. Redbubble Inc., USA
-
Trademark News: What you might have missed in June 2023
-
USA: SunEarth, Inc. v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co., Ltd, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Nos. 13-17622, 24 May 2016