It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try one of the links below or a search?
Popular Articles:
-
Oh Cannabis!
-
Cocktail lovers – watch out! Are alcoholic drinks similar to non-alcoholic ones (and if only for trademark purposes)?
-
Geographical Indications: India’s PGI application for ‘Basmati’
-
No monopoly on blue and silver for Red Bull
-
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. Time to rethink the EUTM “unitary character”.
-
Trademark case: ACT 898 Products Inc. v. WS Industries Inc., USA
Recent Articles:
-
Registration of the protected designation of origin “HALLOUMI” in the EU – The General Court comes to the rescue of the European Commission and of the Republic of Cyprus
-
‘Don’t fence me in’: what if your locally used trade name is in between one proprietor’s earlier trade name and a corresponding younger trade mark? – the finale of the Classic Coach Company case
-
Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’
-
Healthy things and Paris Bar – two new GC decisions on “weak marks”
-
Anti- Counterfeiting, Czech Republic, EU trade mark law, Exhaustion of rights, Grey online sales, Parallel imports, Trademark
Information claim the Czech way: smell of partial victory for Chanel against online retailer
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the UK Court of Appeal diverges from the CJEU in statutory acquiescence
Random Articles:
-
US to decide on the registrability of scandalous trademarks
-
Guidance issued by UK customs on Applications for Action post-Brexit
-
A Better Uniform Enforcement of Unitary IP Rights: Court of Justice EU, 27 September 2017, C 24/16 and C-25/16, Nintendo v. BigBen
-
Germany: Strict Rules for Search Engine Advertising by Online Marketplaces
-
Brexit: Assurances on preservation of rights
-
Implementation of the Trademarks Directive in Austria: Noteworthy amendments and other novelties of interest
-
Trademark case: Belmora LLC. v. Bayer Consumer Care AG, USA
-
Norway: Ridicule as a response to claims of trade mark infringement
-
USA: Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc. v. Kentucky Downs, LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, No. 16-5582, 19 April 2017
-
Italy: all colours are the same, but some are more colored than others… and acquired distinctiveness, per se, does not equal reputation/renown.