It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try one of the links below or a search?
Popular Articles:
-
Oh Cannabis!
-
Cocktail lovers – watch out! Are alcoholic drinks similar to non-alcoholic ones (and if only for trademark purposes)?
-
Geographical Indications: India’s PGI application for ‘Basmati’
-
No monopoly on blue and silver for Red Bull
-
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. Time to rethink the EUTM “unitary character”.
-
Trademark case: ACT 898 Products Inc. v. WS Industries Inc., USA
Recent Articles:
-
Registration of the protected designation of origin “HALLOUMI” in the EU – The General Court comes to the rescue of the European Commission and of the Republic of Cyprus
-
‘Don’t fence me in’: what if your locally used trade name is in between one proprietor’s earlier trade name and a corresponding younger trade mark? – the finale of the Classic Coach Company case
-
Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’
-
Healthy things and Paris Bar – two new GC decisions on “weak marks”
-
Anti- Counterfeiting, Czech Republic, EU trade mark law, Exhaustion of rights, Grey online sales, Parallel imports, Trademark
Information claim the Czech way: smell of partial victory for Chanel against online retailer
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the UK Court of Appeal diverges from the CJEU in statutory acquiescence
Random Articles:
-
Article 8(5) EUTMR, Case law, General Court, Reputation, similarity of goods and services, Weak elements in trademarks
General Court allows Danish fashion brand to register their crown logo despite objections from Rolex
-
European Union Trademarks and Austria: Famous mark PUMA beats “PUMA Multipower” for dissimilar goods
-
Trademark case: V.V.V. & Sons Edible Oils Ltd. v. Meenakshi Overseas LLC, USA
-
CJEU on the Kit Kat shape and acquired distinctiveness of EU trade marks for shapes
-
USA: Three Rivers Confections, LLC v. Warman, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, No. 15-3436, 23 September 2016
-
Gömböc # 3: the Final Decision
-
The Alicante Appellate court ruled that Ferrari 488 GTB is a work of art (in case there was ever any doubt …). The 3D printing of derivative bodyworks to be installed on original cars may entail trade mark and copyright infringement
-
Trademark case: SnugglyCat Inc. v. Opfer Communications Inc., USA
-
Case law, Community Trademark, Figurative mark, Infringement action, Lack of distinctiveness, Registrability, Sweden
Sweden: UK company found guilty of EUTM infringement of famous Swedish pattern
-
Welcome to the Kluwer Trademark blog!