It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try one of the links below or a search?
Popular Articles:
-
Oh Cannabis!
-
Cocktail lovers – watch out! Are alcoholic drinks similar to non-alcoholic ones (and if only for trademark purposes)?
-
Geographical Indications: India’s PGI application for ‘Basmati’
-
No monopoly on blue and silver for Red Bull
-
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. Time to rethink the EUTM “unitary character”.
-
Trademark case: ACT 898 Products Inc. v. WS Industries Inc., USA
Recent Articles:
-
Healthy things and Paris Bar – two new GC decisions on “weak marks”
-
Anti- Counterfeiting, Czech Republic, EU trade mark law, Exhaustion of rights, Grey online sales, Parallel imports, Trademark
Information claim the Czech way: smell of partial victory for Chanel against online retailer
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the UK Court of Appeal diverges from the CJEU in statutory acquiescence
-
Pimp my Rolex…
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the Advancetrack case examines REULA and the TMA 1994
-
CJEU rules (again) on shifting burden of proof in Hewlett-Packard case
Random Articles:
-
Time to Pay the Piper? Third Year Anniversary of The First Canadian Trademark Registrations to Issue Without Use Quickly Approaching
-
Denmark: What do LEGO, JENSEN and UTZON have in-common?
-
The Italian “Historic Trademark of National Interest” is now available, but no one knows its real purpose
-
Trademark News: What you might have missed in November 2023
-
European trademark law in Wonderland
-
Priority conflicts between trade names and trademarks in Austria: Defence of prior trade name in trademark cancellation actions
-
The INTA Annual Meeting and a year in the life of a trademark practitioner
-
Sweden: The mark “Taxi Stockholm” distinctive and enforceable for taxi services
-
The EU Trademark Reform Package discussed at the AIPPI Congress
-
Bad faith may be found also for different goods or services, says the Court of Justice