It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try one of the links below or a search?
Popular Articles:
-
Oh Cannabis!
-
Cocktail lovers – watch out! Are alcoholic drinks similar to non-alcoholic ones (and if only for trademark purposes)?
-
Geographical Indications: India’s PGI application for ‘Basmati’
-
No monopoly on blue and silver for Red Bull
-
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. Time to rethink the EUTM “unitary character”.
-
Trademark case: ACT 898 Products Inc. v. WS Industries Inc., USA
Recent Articles:
-
Registration of the protected designation of origin “HALLOUMI” in the EU – The General Court comes to the rescue of the European Commission and of the Republic of Cyprus
-
‘Don’t fence me in’: what if your locally used trade name is in between one proprietor’s earlier trade name and a corresponding younger trade mark? – the finale of the Classic Coach Company case
-
Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’
-
Healthy things and Paris Bar – two new GC decisions on “weak marks”
-
Anti- Counterfeiting, Czech Republic, EU trade mark law, Exhaustion of rights, Grey online sales, Parallel imports, Trademark
Information claim the Czech way: smell of partial victory for Chanel against online retailer
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the UK Court of Appeal diverges from the CJEU in statutory acquiescence
Random Articles:
-
EU: General Court holding UK evidence to be irrelevant post-Brexit: disagreement with earlier General Court decision(s)
-
Confusion, descriptive, descriptive elements, Distinctive Character, Distinctiveness, Germany, Lack of distinctiveness, Level of similarity of marks, National law, National marks, Opposition, Similarity of marks, Trademark, Weak elements in trademarks
Germany: Weak trademarks and their enforcement
-
CJEU: Puma’s feline jumps high: EUIPO must take into account earlier decisions recognizing reputation of a mark invoked in an opposition
-
Influencing the influencers: CMA and CAP issue new guidance on the use of influencers
-
Trademark case: 4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. New York & Co. Inc., USA
-
Biscuit with a reputation
-
Russian update: Supreme Court criticized Customs’ approach to keeping its IP register
-
The eye has a tendency to see what it expects to see, but ZARA and ZANA are not confusingly similar
-
Acquired Distinctiveness, Appeal, cancellation, Case law, Confusion, Distinctiveness, EUIPO, Level of similarity of marks, Likelihood of confusion, Similarity of marks, United Kingdom
L’Oréal is triumphant in the battle of the ‘K’ trade marks
-
The right to self-right: CJEU to rule on functionality of shape for decoration and toys on reference from Hungarian Supreme Court