It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try one of the links below or a search?
Popular Articles:
-
Oh Cannabis!
-
Cocktail lovers – watch out! Are alcoholic drinks similar to non-alcoholic ones (and if only for trademark purposes)?
-
Geographical Indications: India’s PGI application for ‘Basmati’
-
No monopoly on blue and silver for Red Bull
-
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. Time to rethink the EUTM “unitary character”.
-
Trademark case: ACT 898 Products Inc. v. WS Industries Inc., USA
Recent Articles:
-
Registration of the protected designation of origin “HALLOUMI” in the EU – The General Court comes to the rescue of the European Commission and of the Republic of Cyprus
-
‘Don’t fence me in’: what if your locally used trade name is in between one proprietor’s earlier trade name and a corresponding younger trade mark? – the finale of the Classic Coach Company case
-
Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’
-
Healthy things and Paris Bar – two new GC decisions on “weak marks”
-
Anti- Counterfeiting, Czech Republic, EU trade mark law, Exhaustion of rights, Grey online sales, Parallel imports, Trademark
Information claim the Czech way: smell of partial victory for Chanel against online retailer
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the UK Court of Appeal diverges from the CJEU in statutory acquiescence
Random Articles:
-
Reputation of a mark and assessment of the likelihood of confusion (France – Cour de cassation)
-
Lawyers acting as strawmen to clear out the deadwood from the Austrian trademark register
-
ALL QUIET ON THE TÜRKPATENT FRONT
-
Acquired Distinctiveness, Article 8(4) EUTMR, Coexistence, Denmark, descriptive, Lack of distinctiveness, Legal costs, National law
HOLD ON TIGHT Denmark: The importance of obtaining a word mark registration for weak trademarks
-
De Brauw analyses Dutch Supreme Court IP rulings since 2000
-
Are you using your black and white trademarks correctly?
-
Denmark: Trademark use of ØRSTED is justified – the Ørsted family must tolerate the use
-
How Is The French INPI Coping With Its New Attributions Since 1st April 2020?
-
Trademark News: What you might have missed in November 2023
-
Denmark: Use of a family name as trademark was not allowed due to prior registered trademarks