It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try one of the links below or a search?
Popular Articles:
-
Oh Cannabis!
-
Cocktail lovers – watch out! Are alcoholic drinks similar to non-alcoholic ones (and if only for trademark purposes)?
-
Geographical Indications: India’s PGI application for ‘Basmati’
-
No monopoly on blue and silver for Red Bull
-
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. Time to rethink the EUTM “unitary character”.
-
Trademark case: ACT 898 Products Inc. v. WS Industries Inc., USA
Recent Articles:
-
Registration of the protected designation of origin “HALLOUMI” in the EU – The General Court comes to the rescue of the European Commission and of the Republic of Cyprus
-
‘Don’t fence me in’: what if your locally used trade name is in between one proprietor’s earlier trade name and a corresponding younger trade mark? – the finale of the Classic Coach Company case
-
Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’
-
Healthy things and Paris Bar – two new GC decisions on “weak marks”
-
Anti- Counterfeiting, Czech Republic, EU trade mark law, Exhaustion of rights, Grey online sales, Parallel imports, Trademark
Information claim the Czech way: smell of partial victory for Chanel against online retailer
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the UK Court of Appeal diverges from the CJEU in statutory acquiescence
Random Articles:
-
Trademark News: What you might have missed in June 2023
-
Can I use the image or trademark of a “deleb” for advertising purposes?
-
Share a Coke – but only with fluting.
-
Neither identical nor similar but ‘substantially equivalent’: says AG Pitruzzella with respect to the marks filed by an unfaithful agent
-
Trademarks in Transactions – Part II: Rap about Reps & Warranties
-
IP and the draft Brexit Agreement: no surprises (except maybe in Northern Ireland?)
-
Successful decision for L’Oréal against barefaced infringement by RNV
-
Trademark News: What you might have missed in January 2024
-
Colour trademarks: being unusual isn’t enough. Glaxo’s Purple
-
Stung by the CACTUS – the CJEU strikes twice