It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try one of the links below or a search?
Popular Articles:
-
Oh Cannabis!
-
Cocktail lovers – watch out! Are alcoholic drinks similar to non-alcoholic ones (and if only for trademark purposes)?
-
Geographical Indications: India’s PGI application for ‘Basmati’
-
No monopoly on blue and silver for Red Bull
-
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. Time to rethink the EUTM “unitary character”.
-
Trademark case: ACT 898 Products Inc. v. WS Industries Inc., USA
Recent Articles:
-
Healthy things and Paris Bar – two new GC decisions on “weak marks”
-
Anti- Counterfeiting, Czech Republic, EU trade mark law, Exhaustion of rights, Grey online sales, Parallel imports, Trademark
Information claim the Czech way: smell of partial victory for Chanel against online retailer
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the UK Court of Appeal diverges from the CJEU in statutory acquiescence
-
Pimp my Rolex…
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the Advancetrack case examines REULA and the TMA 1994
-
CJEU rules (again) on shifting burden of proof in Hewlett-Packard case
Random Articles:
-
Trademarks in Luxembourg in 2022
-
CIPO Implements Initiatives to Cut Down on Delays in Examination
-
Acquired Distinctiveness, Appeal, cancellation, Denmark, descriptive, Evidence, Lack of distinctiveness
CREAM is that a colour? Distinctive character acquired through use
-
NESTLÉ’S ONE IS NOT THE ONLY ONE…
-
WHOIS blackout and impact on UDRP
-
INDIA: THE COMPLEX PARADIGM OF IMAGE AND PERSONALITY RIGHTS
-
Happy New Rules Hungary 2019!
-
Brexit: Safety engaged on Art.50 trigger
-
Riding on the coat-tails of Pandora – what is acceptable in Denmark?
-
Venezuela Set to Change Official Fees Payment System… Again