It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try one of the links below or a search?
Popular Articles:
-
Oh Cannabis!
-
Cocktail lovers – watch out! Are alcoholic drinks similar to non-alcoholic ones (and if only for trademark purposes)?
-
Geographical Indications: India’s PGI application for ‘Basmati’
-
No monopoly on blue and silver for Red Bull
-
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. Time to rethink the EUTM “unitary character”.
-
Trademark case: ACT 898 Products Inc. v. WS Industries Inc., USA
Recent Articles:
-
Registration of the protected designation of origin “HALLOUMI” in the EU – The General Court comes to the rescue of the European Commission and of the Republic of Cyprus
-
‘Don’t fence me in’: what if your locally used trade name is in between one proprietor’s earlier trade name and a corresponding younger trade mark? – the finale of the Classic Coach Company case
-
Samsung v Swatch: the UK Court of Appeal departs from the EU approach to the E-Commerce Directive ‘safe harbour defence’
-
Healthy things and Paris Bar – two new GC decisions on “weak marks”
-
Anti- Counterfeiting, Czech Republic, EU trade mark law, Exhaustion of rights, Grey online sales, Parallel imports, Trademark
Information claim the Czech way: smell of partial victory for Chanel against online retailer
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the UK Court of Appeal diverges from the CJEU in statutory acquiescence
Random Articles:
-
Is there an interaction between the scope of protection and validity of 3D trademarks?
-
Canada – an Update from the North
-
Luxury and Glamour win: KENZO ESTATE for wines and other goods misappropriates reputation of KENZO
-
The BASIC NET decision: did the CJEU kiss goodbye to the ‘substantial part of EU’ criterion on acquired distinctiveness?
-
SWITZERLAND: IPAD MINI – mini distinctiveness
-
Personality rights of a politician – new ruling by Austrian Supreme Court
-
Trademark case: Simon Property Group L.P. v. Taylor, USA
-
Sweden: no more m&m’s for the Swedes as Mars’ popular chocolates are found infringing the Swedish trademark “m”
-
Nowhere to go for the General Court: Court of Justice allows APE TEES appeal to proceed (C 337/22 P)
-
Trade Marks and Stripes: Three’s Company, Two’s a Crowd