It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try one of the links below or a search?
Popular Articles:
-
Oh Cannabis!
-
Cocktail lovers – watch out! Are alcoholic drinks similar to non-alcoholic ones (and if only for trademark purposes)?
-
Geographical Indications: India’s PGI application for ‘Basmati’
-
No monopoly on blue and silver for Red Bull
-
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. Time to rethink the EUTM “unitary character”.
-
Trademark case: ACT 898 Products Inc. v. WS Industries Inc., USA
Recent Articles:
-
Healthy things and Paris Bar – two new GC decisions on “weak marks”
-
Anti- Counterfeiting, Czech Republic, EU trade mark law, Exhaustion of rights, Grey online sales, Parallel imports, Trademark
Information claim the Czech way: smell of partial victory for Chanel against online retailer
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the UK Court of Appeal diverges from the CJEU in statutory acquiescence
-
Pimp my Rolex…
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the Advancetrack case examines REULA and the TMA 1994
-
CJEU rules (again) on shifting burden of proof in Hewlett-Packard case
Random Articles:
-
What does PureOaty mean?
-
Checkmate: General Court rejects Louis Vuitton’s claim of acquired distinctiveness in its chequerboard pattern
-
Russia: Fast and furious with your trademark registration
-
Brexit: Assurances on preservation of rights
-
Uruguay: Trade Dress Recognized For The First Time In Usd 500,000 Damages Award
-
TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMES: COLLISION OF REGISTRATION RIGHTS
-
Trade Mark case: FACK JU GÖHTE – Constantin Film Produktion v EUIPO
-
Just Say It Or Just Do It: Who Wins The Battle?
-
“An Apple is not an Apple”, at least according to the Swiss Federal Administrative Court…
-
Case law, Evidence, Lack of distinctiveness, National marks, Registrability, Sign used in the course of trade, Switzerland, Trademark
Pink not very unusual for implants, rules Swiss court