It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try one of the links below or a search?
Popular Articles:
-
Oh Cannabis!
-
Cocktail lovers – watch out! Are alcoholic drinks similar to non-alcoholic ones (and if only for trademark purposes)?
-
Geographical Indications: India’s PGI application for ‘Basmati’
-
No monopoly on blue and silver for Red Bull
-
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. Time to rethink the EUTM “unitary character”.
-
Trademark case: ACT 898 Products Inc. v. WS Industries Inc., USA
Recent Articles:
-
Healthy things and Paris Bar – two new GC decisions on “weak marks”
-
Anti- Counterfeiting, Czech Republic, EU trade mark law, Exhaustion of rights, Grey online sales, Parallel imports, Trademark
Information claim the Czech way: smell of partial victory for Chanel against online retailer
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the UK Court of Appeal diverges from the CJEU in statutory acquiescence
-
Pimp my Rolex…
-
UK trade mark law post-Brexit: the Advancetrack case examines REULA and the TMA 1994
-
CJEU rules (again) on shifting burden of proof in Hewlett-Packard case
Random Articles:
-
Trademark case: Simon Property Group L.P. v. Taylor, USA
-
UK: ‘Wrong way round’ confusion won the day in Court of Appeal Decision
-
Appeal, Case law, Company names, Domain name, EU Trademark reform, European Union, Germany, Infringement, Preliminary ruling, Trade name, Trademark
Protection of trade marks against trade names in Germany: Change of law?
-
Denmark: Trademark use of ØRSTED is justified – the Ørsted family must tolerate the use
-
Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases
-
Top Level Judges on Top Level Domains
-
The BASIC NET decision: did the CJEU kiss goodbye to the ‘substantial part of EU’ criterion on acquired distinctiveness?
-
Article 8(5) EUTMR, Case law, General Court, Reputation, similarity of goods and services, Weak elements in trademarks
General Court allows Danish fashion brand to register their crown logo despite objections from Rolex
-
UK Supreme Court decides brand owners should pay costs of implementing blocking injunctions
-
The New Trade Mark Law of Cyprus