Wolters Kluwer Logo Wolters Kluwer Logo
Open search
Search suggestion
Open suggestion box
Search suggestion
log in button See related products
arrow down
Kluwer Trademark Blog
Search filters
Clear all
GENERAL PREFERENCES
Search only titles
Jurisdiction
Category
Tags
Contributor
Date
From
To
End date must be later than the start date.

Search Results for:

862 results available

search-result-placeholder.jpg
Sara Parrello  (Bugnion S.p.A) , Fabio Angelini  (Bugnion S.p.A)
Clinical trials may constitute use, but when they do not, then there is no justification for non-use, says the CJEU
September 11, 2019

The concept of genuine use of a trademark should be the same for all sorts of products/services, but for pharmaceuticals this is not always the case. Given the particular regulatory regime which…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Louise Thorning Ahle  (Zacco Advokatanpartsselskab)
CREAM is that a colour? Distinctive character acquired through use
September 06, 2019

In Denmark - as in the EU - it is possible to overcome an absolute ground for refusal based on non-distinctive character of the mark applied for if the applicant is able to provide proof that the…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
David Yucht  (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
Trademark case: 4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. New York & Co. Inc., USA
September 04, 2019

The panel remanded an award of attorney fees and prejudgment interest based on its new precedent on what makes for an "exceptional" case for purposes of Section 35 of the Lanham Act. The U.S. Circuit…

  • Read more
zara-sign-in-vienna
Carolina Pina  (Garrigues)
Is it possible to use a well-known trade mark to promote a contest?
September 03, 2019

What are the limits as regards the use of a well-known trademark to promote a contest? In two similar circumstances, two Spanish courts have reached different conclusions. In this article, we will…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Lasse Skaarup Christensen  (Gorrissen Federspiel) , Kathrine Spinner Madsen  (Gorrissen Federspiel)
Denmark: Conditions for preliminary injunctions – the elements of urgency and current relevance
August 27, 2019

In a recent ruling from 15 August 2019 (BS-6392/2019 SHR) the Danish Maritime and Commercial High Court found that the conditions for issuing a preliminary injunction against the clothing company…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Robert Margolis  (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
Trademark case: Luxottica Grp. SpA v. Airport Mini Mall LLC, USA
August 22, 2019

Mall operators had actual or constructive knowledge of tenants’ infringement, including prior law enforcement raids and eyewear maker Luxottica’s notifications of trademark infringement. A jury…

  • Read more
bikes-arcachon
Bettina Clefsen  (b/cl IP)
Germany: Strict Rules for Search Engine Advertising by Online Marketplaces
August 21, 2019

The German Federal Supreme Court recently ruled that the use of only one trademark in search engine advertisements by Amazon was trademark infringing when the underlying link led to a list of offers…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Agnieszka Sztoldman  (Osborne Clarke, University of Wrocław)
No monopoly on blue and silver for Red Bull
August 13, 2019

On 29 July 2019, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) handed down a ruling that ended a six-year battle over the validity of trademark rights in the name of Red Bull to the combination of the colours…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
Robert Margolis  (Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)
Trademark case: Beach Mart Inc. v. L&L Wings Inc., USA
August 08, 2019

A licensor’s failure to disclose in discovery an agreement acknowledging that a third party owned the mark was properly sanctioned. Two beach merchandise retailers asserting rights to use the mark "…

  • Read more
search-result-placeholder.jpg
David Leffler  (Cirio Law Firm)
Monopoly at the Boards of Appeal – Bad faith concerning re-applications and re-filings
August 07, 2019

On 22 July 2019, the Second Board of Appeal at EUIPO issued a decision partially invalidating the EUTM ‘MONOPOLY’. The reason for the invalidation was that the Board considered the EUTM proprietor to…

  • Read more
431 - 440 of 862 results
  • 1
  • ...
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • ...
  • 87
  • About Kluwer Trademark Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
    Wolters Kluwer: IP Law
  • Wolters Kluwer on X
    Wolters Kluwer: X
  • KLI YouTube
    YouTube
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy and Use of Cookies
  • User Agreement and Disclaimer

©2025 Kluwer Law International, part of Wolters Kluwer. All rights reserved