Case law, cosmetic trademarks, Exhaustion of rights, Germany, Grey online sales, Infringement, Infringement action, Reputation, Trademark

(b/cl IP)/ /Leave a comment

In Germany, the Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf decided that trademark rights were not exhausted in a case where luxury cosmetic products were offered at a German discounter. The Court held that the offer of the luxury cosmetic products at the discounter stores as well as at the discounter’s online-shop would be detrimental for the image…

Bundesgerichtshof, Case law, Germany, Infringement, Infringement action, pharmaceutical trademarks, Trademark

(b/cl IP)/ /Leave a comment

In yet another decision, the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has ruled on whether an injunction also obliged an infringer to take active steps to stop the distribution of infringing products through resellers (decision of the BGH of 11 October 2017 in Case I ZB 96/16). The case follows a series of earlier decisions by…

Bundesgerichtshof, Case law, Genuine use, Germany, Non Use

(b/cl IP)/ /Leave a comment

Combining trademarks with further elements or sub-brands is quite popular. A recent decision of the German Federal Supreme reminds once more what to watch out for if you do not want to lose your trademark rights (decision of 11 May 2017 in Case I ZB 6/16). The owner of the German word mark registration for…

Case law, Germany, Level of similarity of marks, Opposition, Trademark

(b/cl IP)/ /Leave a comment

Where the marks differ in only a single additional letter at the end of one of the marks, can the resulting similarity be “neutralized” by the conceptual differences? The German Federal Patent Court decided on 19 June 2017 that the opposing mark “Combit” and the attacked mark  were overall dissimilar and that, even if there…

3D Trademark, Case law, Germany, Registrability, Shape marks

(b/cl IP)/ /Leave a comment

Following a request for cancellation, the Federal Patent Court decided to cancel a shape mark for sweets arguing that it exclusively consisted of a shape necessary to obtain a technical result (Decision of the Federal Patent Court of 27 December 2016 on Case 25 W (pat) 59/14). The cancellation request was directed against the German…

Case law, EUTM, Germany, Opposition, Weak elements in trademarks

(b/cl IP)/ /Leave a comment

A recent decision of the Federal Patent Court in Germany (Decision of 1 March 2016 on Case 29 W (pat) 33/13) shows that the unitary character of an EU trademark (EUTM) does not necessarily mean that it enjoys the same level of protection in all EU member states. In opposition proceedings in Germany, the Federal…

Case law, Germany, Infringement action

(b/cl IP)/ /Leave a comment

The Higher District Court of Düsseldorf had to decide whether the parallel importer of medical devices also had to provide the trademark owner at its request with a specimen of the re-labelled product. In its detailed decision of 12 April 2016 on case I-20 U 48/15 the court held that medical devices were rather more…

3D Trademark, Case law, Figurative mark, Food, Germany, Lack of distinctiveness, Registrability, Shape marks

(b/cl IP)/ /Leave a comment

In cancellation proceedings the German Federal Patent Court denied registrability to a 3-D-mark depicting a chocolate stick for chocolate products largely based on evidence it had collected on its own motion (Decision of 22 April 2016 on Case 25 W(pat) 8/09). The International Registration (“IR”) depicted below was registered in December 2005 in Germany. In…

Case law, EUTM, Germany, Keyword advertising

(b/cl IP)/ /Leave a comment

The Higher District Court of Cologne held in preliminary injunction proceedings that use of a distinctive trademark on amazon.de for displaying other comparable products not originating from the trademark owner may be a trademark infringement (decision of 20 November 2015 on Case 6 U 40/15). The case concerned a practice of Amazon on its German…