Confusion, descriptive, descriptive elements, Distinctive Character, Distinctiveness, Germany, Lack of distinctiveness, Level of similarity of marks, National law, National marks, Opposition, Similarity of marks, Trademark, Weak elements in trademarks

(b/cl IP)/ /Leave a comment

The question of how far descriptive or non-distinctive trademarks which somehow managed to be registered may be enforced is of particular relevance in jurisdictions like Germany which acknowledge their incontestability ten years after registration. The more recent approach of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) was that it accepted likelihood of confusion also in a…

Brexit, EUIPO

(Stobbs IP) and (Potter Clarkson LLP)/ /Leave a comment

With the original Brexit date now having passed (29 March 2019), it is worth reflecting on where we now find ourselves, as brand owners/IP professionals with interests in the UK and EU. The EU has granted the UK a ‘flextension’ to the Article 50 period until 31 October 2019, with the option to leave sooner…

Confusion, United States

(Nirma University)/ /Leave a comment

On 20th March 2019, the US Patent and Trademark Office had to decide about the conflict between the trademarks of Nike and Cheryl Bauman-Buffone. Cheryl Bauman-Buffone sought registration of her mark “JUST SAY IT” for books and downloadable e-books, both in “in the field of promoting healthy lifestyles encompassing physical, social, emotional and spiritual aspects…

Case law, Infringement, United States

(Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)/ /Leave a comment

A seller of parody tote bags that prevailed on trademark infringement, dilution, and copyright infringement claims brought by Louis Vuitton was not entitled to recover attorney fees. Case date: 15 March 2019 Case number: No. 18-293-cv. Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP…

Article 8(5) EUTMR, conceptual difference, General Court, Trademark

, (Bugnion S.p.A)/ /Leave a comment

In the US to indicate two things which are truly… incomparable, one says “oranges and apples”. In continental EU, we  say “apples and pears”. This case deals indeed with apples and pears. On 31 January 2019, the General Court of the European Union had to decide about the similarity between an apple and a pear…

Brexit, European Union, United Kingdom

, (Stobbs IP)/ /Leave a comment

It’s been a busy couple of weeks for the UK government, and what can now only be described as the Brexit nightmare rumbles on. Despite the deadline for the UK’s departure from the EU being just over a week away, we are still no clearer on how or when exactly this will take place, with…

Case law, United States

(Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)/ /Leave a comment

The Third Circuit ruled that Galderma Laboratories owned the trademark to “Restoraderm” pursuant to a 2002 contract between Galderma’s predecessor in interest and the individual inventor of “Restoraderm,” reversing a lower court ruling that the inventor owned the trademark because a subsequent 2004 contract superseded the 2002 agreement. Case date: 26 February 2019 Case number: No….

Confusion, Distinctive Character, Distinctiveness, Figurative mark, Opposition, Reputation, Switzerland, Trademark

(MLL Meyerlustenberger Lachenal Froriep AG)/ /Leave a comment

Yet another trademark dispute has been taken to court by APPLE. This time, APPLE lodged a trademark opposition against the letter „j“ trademark of an Italian incorporation by the name „Steve Jobs“ in front of the Swiss Federal Administrative Court (FAC) (B-1176/2017 (FAC)). After APPLE had failed to cancel the opposed trademark before the Institute…

Case law, United States

(Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US)/ /Leave a comment

Express Oil Change’s use of the phrase “Tire Engineers” in its Mississippi centers was protected commercial speech. Case date: 19 February 2019 Case number: No. 18-60144 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.