A licensor’s failure to disclose in discovery an agreement acknowledging that a third party owned the mark was properly sanctioned.
Two beach merchandise retailers asserting rights to use the mark “WINGS” in connection with their stores will have to go to trial to sort out their competing rights, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Richmond has held. The court reversed summary judgment dismissing a claim by Beach Mart, Inc. that the federal registrations owned by L&L Wings, Inc. for that mark, which Beach Mart had licensed from L&L, should be cancelled because L&L, in fact, itself was a licensee of the mark from a third-party. The court also affirmed a district judge’s order sanctioning L&L for failing to disclose its third-party license agreement in discovery (Beach Mart, Inc. v. L&L Wings, Inc., August 1, 2019, Keenan, B.).
Case date: 01 August 2019
Case number: No. 18-1477
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.
_____________________________
To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Trademark Blog, please subscribe here.
Kluwer IP Law
The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?
Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.
