The existence of a contractual relationship between the two parties was not a prerequisite to the power of the district court to adjudicate the breach of contract claim.

Whether the assignment of a trademark for a brand of children’s products was valid was a question of contractual standing rather than Article III standing, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in vacating and remanding a district court’s decision to dismiss the purported trademark owner’s lawsuit for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The trademark owner satisfied the requirements for Article III standing (SM Kids, LLC v. Google LLC, June 25, 2020, Parker, B).

Case date: 25 June 2020
Case number: No. 19-2547-cv
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.


To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Trademark Blog, please subscribe here.

Kluwer IP Law

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *