A party that appeals a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) decision to the Federal Circuit does not waive the right to challenge a subsequent TTAB decision in district court.

A North Carolina district court erred in finding that it lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal of a TTAB decision issued after remand from the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, has held. Even though a party to an opposition proceeding had chosen to take its initial appeal to the Federal Circuit, it did not waive its right to challenge a subsequent TTAB decision in the case in federal district court. The text of Section 21 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc, March 17, 2021, Wynn, J.).

Case date: 17 March 2021
Case number: No. 19-2316
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.


_____________________________

To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Trademark Blog, please subscribe here.


Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *