The district court erred in considering the failure to produce evidence of actual confusion at this preliminary stage, but the error did not affect the outcome.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware correctly denied a preliminary injunction after it concluded that the trademark holder failed to provide evidence of irreparable harm in the absence of the requested injunction, held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The circuit court detailed the steps courts should take in considering motions for preliminary injunction under the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 (TMA) and found only minor errors in the district court’s process (Nichino America Inc. v. Valent U.S.A. LLC, August 12, 2022, Matey, P.).

Case date: 12 August 2022
Case number: No. 21-1850
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.


To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Trademark Blog, please subscribe here.

Kluwer IP Law

The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?

Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.

Kluwer IP Law
This page as PDF

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *